A divide persists between visualizations that impress through flashy aesthetics versus those that effectively communicate insights. Design choices that prioritize visual embellishments over clarity often leave end users lacking clear direction or measurable value from the underlying data. This widespread “visual-value gap” causes tangible harm by diluting trust in data reporting or analyses that appear polished but yield little usable insights or intelligence upon deeper inspection.
Defining the Visual-Value Gap
The visual-value gap refers to the clear disconnect between aesthetically pleasing visuals and those optimized for user comprehension or enabling impactful conclusions. Attractive data stories fail to realize full value when style supersedes purpose. Form over function may initially grab attention but ultimately provide little substance to sustain meaning or utility.
For example, dense multi-colored visuals with 3D effects or swirling animations signal transformative insights through sheer graphical prowess. However, underneath the glossy visuals often lies data easily summarized in a simple bar chart. Superfluous visuals tend to impose excessive cognitive load for unreliable payoff.
Prevalence Across Industries
Read the full story
Sign up
now to read the full story and get access to all posts for
subscribers only.
Subscribe